What Does Fukushima’s New “Level 7” Status Mean?
Posted by Admin on April 12, 2011
Japanese officials announced on Tuesday morning that they were planning to raise the event level at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant from a 5 to the maximum level of 7, the highest on the international scale for nuclear incidents and the same level assigned to the 1986 disaster at Chernobyl in the Ukraine.
The decision was made after Japan‘s nuclear safety body determined that at one point after the March 11 earthquake, the plant was releasing 10,000 terabecquerels of iodine-131 for several hours; level 7 accidents are defined as releasing tens of thousands of terabecquerels. “The INES rating itself is not an indicator of a daily phenomena, but the assessment after careful consideration and calculation on the event that happened in the past,” Ken Morita of NISA told TIME on Tuesday morning. (See inside Japan’s nuclear wasteland.)
NISA has also noted, however, that the amount of radioactive material being released at Fukushima today is less than 1 terabecquerel. The agency says that, to date, Fukushima has only released about 10% of total radiation released 25 years ago in Chernobyl, or about 1.8 million terabecquerels. About 30 people, mostly workers, died in the immediate aftermath of Chernobyl, though the UN has estimated that the long-term death toll due to exposure could eventually be as high as 4000.
The International Nuclear Event Scale (INES), designed in 1989 by the IAEA and the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) of the OECD, ranges from 1 (anomaly) to 7 (major accident). The scale is intended to help easily communicate with the public to indicate the seriousness of a nuclear event. Chernobyl is the only other nuclear accident to have been given a 7, an accident classified as having a major radioactive release with widespread impact on the environment and public health. According to INES, “Such a release would result in the possibility of acute health effects; delayed health effects over a wide area, possibly involving more than one country; long-term environmental consequences.” (Read the IAEA’s glossary of short- to long-term health effects of radiation exposure here.) (See the world’s top 10 environmental disasters.)
Besides Chernobyl, the only event that’s come close to a 7 before was a 1957 accident at a fuel processing plant (where spent nuclear fuel is recycled into new fuel) in Russia, in which an off-site release of radiation prompted preventative evacuations. The Three Mile Island accident in the U.S. in 1978, in which a reactor core was severely damage but off-site release of radioactivity was limited, was classified as a 5. Almost all reported events at nuclear facilities are a level 3 or under, according to INES.
Tuesday’s announcement comes on the back of a minor fire spotted by workers outside Fukushima’s reactor 4 on Tuesday morning, shortly after the second of three major aftershocks to hit the beleaguered northeast in the space of 24 hours. Three people in Iwaki died in landslides triggered by the 7.1 aftershock on Monday evening. The government also expanded the exclusion zone around Fukushima on Monday to include several towns within a 30-km (19-mile) radius that had formerly been told that they could remain at home, but were recommended to stay indoors. The towns now added to the mandatory evacuation zone were found to have high levels of radiation. (See the battle to hold Fukushima’s cores.)
Meanwhile, Greenpeace has said that in a survey conducted in Fukushima last week, its team of experts found radiation levels 75 times higher than the government recommendation in 11 samples of vegetables from gardens and small farms. The environmental group also announced that it found radiation levels equivalent to an annual exposure of 5 millisieverts – the evacuation threshold for Chernobyl – in a playground in Fukushima City, population 300,000. Greenpeace is urging the government to delay the start of the school year.
Though raising Fukushima’s level to 7 may not herald any immediate worsening of events, it is sure to add to many residents’ growing concern – and feelings of helplessness – over what could happen at dozens of other nuclear reactors spread across this seismic archipelago. On Sunday, over 17,000 people protested at two separate demonstrations in Tokyo against nuclear power. It was the first time that Yohei Nakamura, 45, had ever been to a protest. “For a long time I’ve been suspicious of nuclear power, but now I realize it’s a serious problem,” he said amidst the crowds carrying placards and shouting slogans. He said anti-nuclear demonstrations were undercovered in the Japanese press because of the influence of Tokyo Power and Electric Power Company, which owns Fukushima. “TEPCO is one of the most powerful companies in Japan,” Nakamura said. “They use a tremendous amount of money for adverstising. If the mass media shows anti-nuclear power activities like demonstrations, they risk losing TEPCO as an advertiser.”
- Japan Declares Crisis at Level of Chernobyl (online.wsj.com)
- Japan ups nuke crisis severity to match Chernobyl (ctv.ca)
- Japan’s Chernobyl: Nuke crisis level raised (cbsnews.com)
- TOKYO: Severity Of Crisis At Crippled Nuclear Plant Now Match Chernobyl Disaster (lostchildreninthewilderness.wordpress.com)
- Japan Nuclear Disaster Put on Par With Chernobyl – New York Times (news.google.com)
- Fukushima Likely to be Rated Level 7 on the International Nuclear Event Scale (slog.thestranger.com)
- Japan Widens Evacuation Area (online.wsj.com)
- Japan upgrades nuclear crisis to same level as Chernobyl (guardian.co.uk)
- Japan Raises Nuclear Threat Level to Highest Possible (onebluestocking.wordpress.com)
- Japan nuclear crisis on same level as Chernobyl (msnbc.msn.com)
- Progress 20110412 (bluegriffon.org)
- links for 2011-04-11 (martinandrade.wordpress.com)
- 20110411-Papers Away (thebloggingpath.com)
- Before It Explodes (current.com)
- 20110411-More Spooks (thebloggingpath.com)
- Bryan Baird’s Newsletter (2011/04/11) (shizuokagourmet.wordpress.com)
- I can’t belive this … news article on yahoo… (cityandcountrysahm.wordpress.com)
- links for 2011-04-11 (economistsview.typepad.com)
- Food & Drinks Bloggers in Japan (expanded on 2011/04/12) (shizuokagourmet.wordpress.com)
- A Response from RealCatholicTV (deaconjohnspace.wordpress.com)
- Japan Considers Raising Nuclear Disaster from Level 5 to 7 Based on Extremely High Radiation Readings (ritholtz.com)
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.