Revolutionizing Awareness

helping humanity, make choices, more so through awareness, than ignorance

Posts Tagged ‘Non-governmental organization’

Libya and the Big Lie: Using Human Rights Organizations to Launch Wars

Posted by Admin on September 30, 2011

by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya
Global Research, September 29, 2011
– 2011-09-24

The war against Libya is built on fraud. The United Nations Security Council passed two resolutions against Libya on the basis of unproven claims, specifically that Colonel Muammar Qaddafi was killing his own people in Benghazi and Libya. The claim in its exact form was that Qaddafi had ordered Libyan forces to kill 6,000 people in Benghazi as well as in other parts of the country. These claims were widely disseminated, but always vaguely explained. It was on the basis of this claim that Libya was referred to the U.N. Security Council at U.N Headquarters in New York City and kicked out of the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva.

False claims about African mercenary armies in Libya and about jet attacks on civilians were also used in a broad media campaign against Libya. These two claims have been sidelined and have become more and more murky. The massacre claims, however, were used in a legal, diplomatic, and military framework to justify NATO’s war on Libya.

Using Human Rights as a Pretext for War: The LLHR and its Unproven Claims

One of the main sources for the claim that Qaddafi was killing his own people is the Libyan League for Human Rights (LLHR). The LLHR was actually pivotal to getting the U.N. involved through its specific claims in Geneva. On February 21, 2011 the LLHR got the 70 other non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to sent letters to the President Obama, E.U. High Representative Catherine Ashton., and the U.N. Secretary-General Ban-ki Moon demanding international action against Libya invoking the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine. Only 25 members of this coalition actually assert that they are human rights groups.

The letter is as follows:

We, the undersigned non-governmental, human rights, and humanitarian organizations, urge you to mobilize the United Nations and the international community and take immediate action to halt the mass atrocities now being perpetrated by the Libyan government against its own people. The inexcusable silence cannot continue.

As you know, in the past several days, Colonel Moammar Gadhafi’s forces are estimated to have deliberately killed hundreds of peaceful protesters and innocent bystanders across the country. In the city of Benghazi alone, one doctor reported seeing at least 200 dead bodies. Witnesses report that a mixture of special commandos, foreign mercenaries and regime loyalists have attacked demonstrators with knives, assault rifles and heavy-caliber weapons.

Snipers are shooting peaceful protesters. Artillery and helicopter gunships have been used against crowds of demonstrators. Thugs armed with hammers and swords attacked families in their homes. Hospital officials report numerous victims shot in the head and chest, and one struck on the head by an anti-aircraft missile. Tanks are reported to be on the streets and crushing innocent bystanders. Witnesses report that mercenaries are shooting indiscriminately from helicopters and from the top of roofs. Women and children were seen jumping off Giuliana Bridge in Benghazi to escape. Many of them were killed by the impact of hitting the water, while others were drowned. The Libyan regime is seeking to hide all of these crimes by shutting off contact with the outside world. Foreign journalists have been refused entry. Internet and phone lines have been cut or disrupted.

There is no question here about intent. The government media has published open threats, promising that demonstrators would meet a “violent and thunderous response.”

Accordingly, the government of Libya is committing gross and systematic violations of the right to life as guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Citizens seeking to exercise their rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly are being massacred by the government.

Moreover, the government of Libya is committing crimes against humanity, as defined by the Explanatory Memorandum to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The Libyan government’s mass killing of innocent civilians amount to particularly odious offences which constitute a serious attack on human dignity. As confirmed by numerous oral and video testimonies gathered by human rights organizations and news agencies, the Libyan government’s assault on its civilian population are not isolated or sporadic events. Rather, these actions constitute a widespread and systematic policy and practice of atrocities, intentionally committed, including murder, political persecution and other inhumane acts which reach the threshold of crimes against humanity.

Responsibility to Protect

Under the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document, you have a clear and unambiguous responsibility to protect the people of Libya. The international community, through the United Nations, has the responsibility to use appropriate diplomatic, humanitarian and other peaceful means, in accordance with Chapters VI and VIII of the Charter, to help to protect the Libyan population. Because the Libyan national authorities are manifestly failing to protect their population from crimes against humanity, should peaceful means be inadequate, member states are obliged to take collective action, in a timely and decisive manner, through the Security Council, in accordance with the UN Charter, including Chapter VII.

In addition, we urge you to convene an emergency Special Session of the UN Human Rights Council, whose members have a duty, under UNGA Resolution 60/251, to address situations of gross and systematic violations of violations of human rights. The session should:

-Call for the General Assembly to suspend Libya’s Council membership, pursuant to Article 8 of Resolution 60/251, which applies to member states that commit gross and systematic violations of human rights.

-Strongly condemn, and demand an immediate end to, Libya’s massacre of its own citizens.

-Dispatch immediately an international mission of independent experts to collect relevant facts and document violations of international human rights law and crimes against humanity, in order to end the impunity of the Libyan government. The mission should include an independent medical investigation into the deaths, and an investigation of the unlawful interference by the Libyan government with the access to and treatment of wounded.

-Call on the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights and the Council’s relevant Special Procedures to closely monitor the situation and take action as needed.

-Call on the Council to remain seized of the matter and address the Libyan situation at its upcoming 16th regular session in March.

Member states and high officials of the United Nations have a responsibility to protect the people of Libya from what are preventable crimes. We urge you to use all available measures and levers to end atrocities throughout the country.

We urge you to send a clear message that, collectively, the international community, the Security Council and the Human Rights Council will not be bystanders to these mass atrocities. The credibility of the United Nations — and many innocent lives — are at stake. [1]

According to Physicians for Human Rights: “[This letter was] prepared under the guidance of Mohamed Eljahmi, the noted Libyan human rights defender and brother of dissident Fathi Eljahmi, asserts that the widespread atrocities committed by Libya against its own people amount to war crimes, requiring member states to take action through the Security Council under the responsibility to protect doctrine.” [2]

The letters signatories included Francis Fukuyama, United Nations Watch (which looks out for Israel’s interests and according to Israeli sources organized the entire session against the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya), B’nai B’rith Human Rights Commission, the Cuban Democratic Directorate, and a set of organizations at odds with the governments of Nicaragua, Cuba, Sudan, Russia, Venezuela, and Libya. Some of these organizations are viewed with hostility as organizations created to wage demonization campaigns against countries at odds with the U.S., Israel, and the European Union. Refer to the annex for the full list of signatories for consultation.

LLHR is tied to the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), which is based in France and has ties to the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). FIDH is active in many places in Africa and in activities involving the National Endowment for Democracy in the African continent. Both the FIDH and LLHR also released a joint communiqué on February 21, 2011. In the communiqué both organizations asked for the international community to “mobilize” and mention the International Criminal Court while also making a contradictory claiming that over 400 to 600 people had died since February 15, 2011. [3] This of course was about 5,500 short of the claim that 6,000 people were massacred in Benghazi. The joint letter also promoted the false view that 80% of Qaddafi’s support came from foreign mercenaries, which is something that over half a year of fighting proves as untrue.

According to the General-Secretary of the LLHR, Dr. Sliman Bouchuiguir, the claims about the massacres in Benghazi could not be validated by the LLHR when he was challenged for proof. When asked how a group of 70 non-governmental organizations in Geneva could support the LLHR’s claims on Geneva, Dr. Buchuiguir has answered that a network of close relationship was the basis. This is a mockery.

Speculation is neither evidence nor grounds for starting a war with a bombing campaign that has lasted about half a year and taken many innocent civilian lives, including children and the elderly. What is important to note here is that the U.N. Security Council decided to sanction the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya on the basis of this letter and the claims of the LLHR. Not once did the U.N. Security Council and the member states pushing for war once bother to even investigate the allegations. In one session in New York City, the Indian Ambassador to the U.N. actually pointed this out when his country abstained from voting. Thus, a so-called “humanitarian war” was launched without any evidence.

Global Research Editor’s Note: U.N. Watch which actively promoted the LLHR statement has informal ties to the U.S. State Department. It was established during the Clinton Administration in 1993 under the Chairmanship of Morris B. Abram, a former U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva. U.N. Watch is formally affiliated with the American Jewish Committee (AJC), a powerful pro-Israeli political lobby organization based in New York City.

The Secret Relationship between the LLHR and the Transitional Council

The claims of the Libyan League for Human Rights (LLHR) were coordinated with the formation of the Transitional Council. This becomes clear when the close and cagey relationship of the LLHR and the Transitional Council becomes apparent. Logically, the Obama Administration and NATO had to also be a part of this.

Whatever the Transitional Council is and whatever the intent of some of its supporters, it is clear that it is being used as a tool by the U.S. and others. Moreover, five members of the LLHR were or would become members of the Transitional Council almost immediately after the claims against the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya were disseminated. According to Bouchuguir individuals with ties to the LLHR or who hold membership include Mahmoud Jibril and Ali Tarhouni.

Dr. Mahmoud Jibril is a Libyan regime figure brought into Libyan government circles by Saif Al-Islam Qaddafi. He would undemocratically be given the position of Transitional Council prime minister. His involvement with the LLHR raises some real questions about the organization.

The economist Ali Tarhouni on the other hand would become the minister for oil and finance for the Transitional Council. Tarhouni is Washington’s man in Libya. He was groomed in the United States and was present at all the major meetings about plans for regime change in Libya. As Minister of Oil and Finance the first acts he did were privatize and virtually handover Libya’s energy resources and economy to the foreign corporations and governments of the NATO-led coalition against Libya.

The General-Secretary of the LLHR, Sliman Bouchuiguir, has even privately admitted that many influential members of the Transitional Council are his friends. A real question of interests arises. Yet, the secret relationship between the LLHR and the Transitional Council is far more than a question of conflict of interest. It is a question of justice and manipulation.

Who is Sliman Bouchuiguir?

Sliman Bouchuguir is an unheard of figure for most, but he has authored a doctoral thesis that has been widely quoted and used in strategic circles in the United States. This thesis was published in 1979 as a book, The Use of Oil as a Political Weapon: A Case Study of the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo. The thesis is about the use of oil as an economic weapon by Arabs, but can easily be applied to the Russians, the Iranians, the Venezuelans, and others. It examines economic development and economic warfare and can also be applied to vast regions, including all of Africa.

Bouchuguir’s analytical thesis reflects an important line of thinking in Washington, as well as London and Tel Aviv. It is both the embodiment of a pre-existing mentality, which includes U.S. National Security Advisor George F. Kennan’s arguments for maintaining a position of disparity through a constant multi-faced war between the U.S. and its allies on one hand and the rest of the world on the other hand. The thesis can be drawn on for preventing the Arabs, or others, from becoming economic powers or threats. In strategic terms, rival economies are pinned as threats and as “weapons.” This has serious connotations.

Moreover, Bouchuiguir did his thesis at George Washington University under Bernard Reich. Reich is a political scientist and professor of international relations. He has worked and held positions at places like the U.S. Defense Intelligence College, the United States Air Force Special Operations School, the Marine Corps War College, and the Shiloah Center at Tel Aviv University. He has consulted on the Middle East for the Foreign Service Institute of the U.S. State Department and received grants such as the Defense Academic Research Support Program Research Grant and the German Marshal Fund Grant. Reich also was or is presently on the editorial boards of journals such as Israel Affairs (1994-present), Terrorism: An International Journal (1987-1994), and The New Middle East (1971-1973).

It is also clear that Reich is tied to Israeli interests. He has even written a book about the special relationship between the U.S and Israel. He has also been an advocate for a “New Middle East” which would be favourable to Israel. This includes careful consideration over North Africa. His work has also focused on the important strategic interface between the Soviet Union and the Middle East and also on Israeli policy in the continent of Africa.

It is clear why Bouchuiguir had his thesis supervised under Reich. On October 23, 1973, Reich gave a testimony at the U.S. Congress. The testimony has been named “The Impact of the October Middle East War” and is clearly tied to the 1973 oil embargo and Washington’s aim of pre-empting or managing any similar events in the future. It has to be asked, how much did Reich influence Bouchuiguir and if Bouchuiguir espouses the same strategic views as Reich?

The “New North Africa” and a “New Africa” – More than just a “New Middle East”

A “New Africa” is in the works, which will have its borders further drawn out in blood like in the past. The Obama Administration and its allies have opened the gateway for a new invasion of Africa. United States Africa Command (AFRICOM) opened the salvos of the war through Operation Odyssey Damn, before the war on Libya was transferred to NATO’s Operation Unified Protector.

The U.S. has used NATO to continue the occupation of post-Second World War Europe. It will now use AFRICOM to occupy Africa and create an African NATO. It is clear the U.S. wants an expanded military presence in Libya and Africa under the disguise of humanitarian aid missions and fighting terrorism – the same terrorism that it is fanning in Libya and Africa.

The way is being paved for intervention in Africa under the guise of fighting terrorism. General Carter Ham has stated: “If we were to launch a humanitarian operation, how do we do so effectively with air traffic control, airfield management, [and] those kind of activities?” [4] General Ham’s question is actually a sales pitch for fashioning African military partnerships and integration, as well as new bases that could include the use of more military drones against Libya and other African countries. The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) have both made it clear that the Pentagon is actively trying to establish more drone bases in Africa and the Arabian Peninsula to expand its wars. [5] In this context, the AFRICOM Commander says that there are ties between the Al-Shabaab in Somalia, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb in North Africa, and the Boko Harem in Nigeria. [6]

The War in Libya is a Fraud

General Ham has said: “I remain confident that had the U.N. not made the decision, had the U.S. not taken the lead with great support, I’m absolutely convinced there are many, many people in Benghazi alive today who would not be [alive].” [7] This is not true and a far stretch from reality. The war has cost more lives than it could have ever saved. It has ruined a country and opened the door into Africa for a neo-colonial project.

The claims of the Libyan League for Human Rights (LLHR) were never supported or verified. The credibility of the United Nations must be questioned as well as the credibility of many humanitarian and human rights organizations that have virtually pushed for a war. At best the U.N. Security Council is an irresponsible body, but it has clearly acted outside of due legal process. This pattern now appears to be repeating itself against the Syrian Arab Republic as unverified claims are being made by individuals and organizations supported by foreign powers that care nothing for authentic democratic reforms or liberty.

Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya is a Sociologist and Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He specializes on the Middle East and Central Asia. He was on the ground in Libya for over two months and was also a Special Correspondent for Flashpoints, which is a program based in Berkeley, California.


[1] United Nations Watch et al., “Urgent Appeal to Stop Atrocities in Libya: Sent by 70 NGOs to the US, EU, and UN,” February 21, 2011:


[2] Physicians for Human Rights, “PHR and Human Rights Groups Call for Immediate Action in Libya,” February 22, 2011:


[3] The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and the Libyan League for Human Rights (LLHR), “Massacres in Libya: The international community must urgently,” respond, February 21, 2011:


[4] Jim Garamone, “Africa Command Learns from Libya Operations,” American Forces Press Service, September 15, 2011:


[5] Gregory Miller and Craig Whitlock, “U.S. U.S. assembling secret drone bases in Africa, Arabian Peninsula, officials say,” The Washington Post, September 20, 2011; Julian E. Barnes, “U.S. Expands Drone Flights to Take Aim at East Africa,” The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), September 21, 2011.

[6] Garamone, “Africa Command Learns,” Op. cit.

[7] Ibid.


February 12, 2011 – Geneva, Switzerland

1. Hillel C. Neuer, United Nations Watch, Switzerland
2. Dr. Sliman Bouchuiguir, Libyan League for Human Rights, Switzerland
3. Mary Kay Stratis, Victims of Pan Am Flight 103, Inc., USA
4. Carl Gershman, President, The National Endowment for Democracy, USA
5. Yang Jianli, Initiatives for China, USA – Former prisoner of conscience and survivor of Tiananmen Square massacre
6. Yang Kuanxing, YIbao – Chinese writer, original signatory to Charter 08, the manifesto calling for political reform in China
7. Matteo Mecacci, MP, Nonviolent Radical Party, Italy
8. Frank Donaghue, Physicians for Human Rights, USA
9. Nazanin Afshin-Jam, Stop Child Executions, Canada
10. Bhawani Shanker Kusum, Gram Bharati Samiti, India
11. G. Jasper Cummeh, III, Actions for Genuine Democratic Alternatives, Liberia
12. Michel Monod, International Fellowship of Reconciliation, Switzerland
13. Esohe Aghatise, Associazione Iroko Onlus, Italy
14. Harris O. Schoenberg, UN Reform Advocates, USA
15. Myrna Lachenal, World Federation for Mental Health, Switzerland
16. Nguyên Lê Nhân Quyên, Vietnamese League for Human Rights, Switzerland
17. Sylvia G. Iriondo, Mothers and Women against Repression (M.A.R. Por Cuba), USA
18. David Littman, World Union for Progressive Judaism, Switzerland
19. Barrister Festus Okoye, Human Rights Monitor, Nigeria
20. Theodor Rathgeber, Forum Human Rights, Germany
21. Derik Uya Alfred, Kwoto Cultural Center, Juba – Southern Sudan
22. Carlos E Tinoco, Consorcio Desarrollo y Justicia, A.C., Venezuela
23. Abdurashid Abdulle Abikar, Center for Youth and Democracy, Somalia
24. Dr. Vanee Meisinger, Pan Pacific and South East Asia Women’s Association, Thailand
25. Simone Abel, René Cassin, United Kingdom
26. Dr. Francois Ullmann, Ingenieurs du Monde, Switzerland
27. Sr Catherine Waters, Catholic International Education Office, USA
28. Gibreil Hamid, Darfur Peace and Development Centre, Switzerland
29. Nino Sergi, INTERSOS – Humanitarian Aid Organization, Italy
30. Daniel Feng, Foundation for China in the 21st Century
31. Ann Buwalda, Executive Director, Jubilee Campaign, USA
32. Leo Igwe, Nigerian Humanist Movement, Nigeria
33. Chandika Gautam, Nepal International Consumers Union, Nepal
34. Zohra Yusuf, Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Pakistan
35. Sekou Doumbia, Femmes & Droits Humains, Mali
36. Cyrille Rolande Bechon, Nouveaux Droits de l’Homme, Cameroon
37. Zainab Al-Suwaij, American Islamic Congress, USA
38. Valnora Edwin, Campaign for Good Governance, Sierra Leone
39. Patrick Mpedzisi, African Democracy Forum, South Africa
40. Phil ya Nangoloh, NamRights, Namibia
41. Jaime Vintimilla, Centro Sobre Derecho y Sociedad (CIDES), Ecuador
42. Tilder Kumichii Ndichia, Gender Empowerment and Development, Cameroon
43. Amina Bouayach, Moroccan Organisation for Human Rights, Morocco
44. Abdullahi Mohamoud Nur, CEPID-Horn Africa, Somalia
45. Delly Mawazo Sesete, Resarch Center on Environment, Democracy & Human Rights, DR Congo
46. Joseph Rahall, Green Scenery, Sierra Leone
47. Arnold Djuma, Solidarité pour la Promotion Sociale et la Paix, Rwanda
48. Panayote Dimitras, Greek Helsinki Monitor, Greece
49. Carlos E. Ponce, Latina American and Caribbean Network for Democracy, Venezuela
50. Fr. Paul Lansu, Pax Christi International, Belgium
51. Tharsika Pakeerathan, Swiss Council of Eelam Tamils, Switzerland
52. Ibrahima Niang, Commission des Droits Humains du Mouvement Citoyen, Senegal
53. Virginia Swain, Center for Global Community and World Law, USA
54. Dr Yael Danieli, International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, USA
55. Savita Gokhale, Loksadhana, India
56. Hasan Dheeree, Biland Awdal Organization, Somalia
57. Pacifique Nininahazwe, Forum pour le Renforcement de la Société Civile, Burundi
58. Derik Uya Alfred, Kwoto Cultural Center, Southern Sudan
59. Michel Golubnichy, International Association of Peace Foundations, Russia
60. Edward Ladu Terso, Multi Media Training Center, Sudan
61. Hafiz Mohammed, Justice Africa Sudan, Sudan
62. Sammy Eppel, B’nai B’rith Human Rights Commission, Venezuela
63. Jack Jeffery, International Humanist and Ethical Union, United Kingdom
64. Duy Hoang, Viet Tan, Vietnam
65. Promotion de la Democratie et Protection des Droits Humains, DR Congo
66. Radwan A. Masmoudi, Center for the Study of Islam & Democracy, USA
67. María José Zamora Solórzano, Movimiento por Nicaragua, Nicaragua
68. John Suarez, Cuban Democratic Directorate, USA
69. Mohamed Abdul Malek, Libya Watch, United Kingdom
70. Journalists Union of Russia, Russia
71. Sindi Medar-Gould, BAOBAB for Women’s Human Rights, Nigeria
72. Derik Uya Alfred, Kwoto Cultural Centre, Sudan
73. Sr. Anne Shaym, Presentation Sisters, Australia
74. Joseph Rahad, Green Scenery, Sierra Leone
75. Fahma Yusuf Essa, Women in Journalism Association, Somalia
76. Hayder Ibrahim Ali, Sudanese Studies Center, Sudan
77. Marcel Claude Kabongo, Good Governance and Human Rights NGO, DR Congo
78. Frank Weston, International Multiracial Shared Cultural Organization (IMSCO), USA
79. Fatima Alaoui, Maghrebin Forum for environment and development, Morocco
80. Ted Brooks, Committee for Peace and Development Advocacy, Liberia
81. Felly Fwamba, Cerveau Chrétien, DR Congo
82. Jane Rutledge, CIVICUS: World Alliance of Citizen Participation, South Africa
83. Ali AlAhmed, The Institute for Gulf Affairs, USA
84. Daniel Ozoukou, Martin Luther King Center for Peace and Social Justice, Cote d’Ivoire
85. Dan T. Saryee, Liberia Democratic Institute (LDI), Liberia

Dr. Frene Ginwala, former Speaker of the South African National Assembly
Philosopher Francis Fukuyama
Mohamed Eljahmi, Libyan human rights activist
Glenn P. Johnson, Jr., Treasurer, Victims of Pan Am Flight 103, Inc., father of Beth Ann Johnson, victim of Lockerbie bombing

Source: U.N. Watch (Refer to note 1)

Global Research Articles by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya

Posted in Geo-Politics, Global Research, War Quotient | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Libya and the Big Lie: Using Human Rights Organizations to Launch Wars

Integration Into ET Reality 2

Posted by Admin on October 11, 2010

Godfather of Exopolitics

Godfather of Exopolitics

Integration Into ET Reality (Part 2)
By Ed Komarek
Copy and Distribute Freely
My Blog:

I have had some very good feedback from a source on the initial fishing expedition article, so I wanted to do at least one more article on this important subject. I realize that many of my readers feel that I am often skating on very thin evidential ice, but it is important to realize that concepts and ideas are access codes.

If one can adequately grasp a true concept even on thin evidence, that concept can then be used to acquire additional information from sources that further builds on the evidential base. Unfortunately Skeptics don’t understand this and so become mentally captured in a Catch 22 conceptual denial trap of their own design.

What follows are parts of an Internet conversation with a old contact of mine who I believe may have a NSA scientific background in extraterrestrial affairs as well as JASON connections. ( The relationship has been strained over the years due to social mistakes and third party complications but that is too long a story to be told here.)

A well respected CIA intelligence scientific professional known to many of us on the Internet told me several years ago that the technical writings of this source were brilliant, but said to me that he would have to deny that if questioned. What follows are fragments of email conversations stimulated by my last article and a conversation with a young up and coming bright academic who is catching on fast to the game at hand.

After writing this article my source wrote an additional email that contains some of the kind of technical information and thinking that caused this well respected CIA contact to comment on the material as brilliant. (If you skeptics think these academic scientific writings amended to this article are of a truck driver you are out of your mind!)

“Hey! I’m not THAT old, Ed. Hahaha, Retirement, if what I do can be called that, is actually more fun than paid work. Well, onto the reason for this missive: There is a far broader spectrum of contacts with extraterrestrials across the board than hitherto realized by anyone. The problem is that is is scattered, and the means are also mixed.

The groups we are involved with is varied and already on the ground in many places of our planet, e.g., Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, in the Midwest; on the west coast, northern California, certain parts of Oregon, and the Seattle area in Washington state. Then there are those mentioned by James who have taken up residence in the south land of CA, under aegis of proprietaries doing business on a broad spectrum of scientific applications. This is only in the U.S.A.

On other countries, the integration is much higher and also much more fruitful. I’ve been working on and off on a book about the link, and in it, we (my colleagues and I) have made mention of these as not only face to face contacts but also as business contacts for various purposes, including but not limited to foodstuff and livestock to specification. Not all of them fall into the cute ET of Spielberg’s lore.

Many of them are meat eaters, but finicky at that. This is not to say meat is the sole source of protein for these people. They also enjoy a wide spectrum of beans and greens. Little or no cheese, thank you. This last one at least from past experience with foods served at the annual conferences. All of these conferences are with NGOs, again from a wide spectrum of service orientations.

Then there is the work done by George LoBuono in and around U.C. Berkeley and up the road on I-80 at the other UC. Ed, you know George from your work with exopolitics with Michael. Chase that one down for more info on what he and others are doing. Very interesting Intel.

As to your comments it seems that integration is an exaggerated term for something far more simple and already under way: the connectivity between life forms with different cultural background, technologies, and imperatives. I think George’s framework of thinking is a useful one, especially as it pertains to imperatives, which every group in our planetary vicinity manifests almost on contact.

Their seeming “psychic superiority” is a mirage of something far more mundane: these guys use a form of thinking and communication that we, for the lack of a better word, have come to call “topological thinking.” I’ll gladly send you whatever I wrote on it. Let me know. But the place to start would be to read George’s Primer about aliens. There are upward of 100 bio-kinds from a this and other galaxies, as we understand it. However, as bio-kinds, I’ve only seen two: humanoids and sauroids, although there is one other type that resembles both without being neither.

Noticeably, mother nature and the creator of the universe seem to be quite economical in what they do so well: create life forms for an apparent single biological source. Recently, Ed asked me to comment on a series of questions about interfaces said to have been done by no such agency; the questions were good ones and to the point; however, I’m not a computer expert by any stretch of anyone’s imagination and have to comments to make or any pearls to contribute. Source is referring to this article, )

That there is interface, I have no doubts, especially with regard to entangled computers that, without being quantum computers, behave like ones. Got attacked by one not to far back. Some headaches and little damage, but that’s about it. Nevertheless, they are out there. Let me make a suggestion in the strongest possible terms: get hold of LoBuono’s Primer and read it, cover to cover. If you don’t have one, let me know, will send you one.

While hopping and skipping across a broad swath of topics, he does cover what is absolutely necessary for any thinking human COBE (complex oscillating biological entity) from Earth to consider, thinking galactically but also considering things locally with such a mind-scape. His “transversals” are quite real; we’ve met and befriended one, who occasionally tweaks one of us for a short in passing conversation. George raises issues we ALL need to think about, seriously.

These guys are not necessarily our saviors, fantasies aside. We engage them for what they are: people with agendas. We need to know theirs, update our Intel on them and theirs daily, weekly, monthly, annually. And keep the lines of communication open. And the lines of business; these guys are NOT without means as we understand value (money). Some already have human cohorts with which they work and through whom do business with the world at large. Whoever said ET was not a businessperson does not understand the changing realities of living on and near Earth space. This is also way beyond the metal ships that fascinate everyone.

Ed, you’ve got to see what’s up with the group in socal. If blocked, seek aid from James and his group. He’s come out with an interesting tract about us as sovereign integrals. Very much to the point. They are hosted by a proprietary I was told, and they are most likely the group that he talked about in his writings earlier this decade. It may well be the head of the serpent as well, which seems to now to have caught your fancy and attention. SAMs are here, brother. And they are not nice. Don’t play nice. Don’t like us, it seems. I for one want nothing to do with them. So if you can get something on that topic, we’ll all be appreciative of your reportorial efforts. You have my best wishes on it.

Stay in touch and thanks for the compliment Ed. It will only redouble my campaign to continue working at decreasing my bio-electric age.. Right now it’s at 46, but I think I can do better. My biological age is 62. Sonobioelectrogravitic health is important. And we can all do it. How do you think these guys have long lives? They feed off the vacuum at the cellular level, some of them! We’re using that technology now with people who are coming down with the likes of ALS, fibromyalgia, and others. Still too early to tell.

However, there are great results with fibromyalgia with a few treated over the net. Ed, this universe, indeed, all of creation, is idiomaterial – thought and matter simultaneously. It is also bi-causal, not uni-causal as public domain science would have us believe. How do you think these guys draw from a vacuum that is itself very deterministic? Each cell can be made to turn into a mini black hole and, like a car at a gas pump, pump energy needed and no more. We were told this by some of them, and it is the same thing the people we taught to do this with their fibro are reporting happening to them as well. Go figure.

Namaste. (Name deleted)”


In this note, let me expand upon some ideas for you to chew on and discuss openly on your blog and with your open and secret contacts.

There is a problem in the way USG and the network that participates in the unified response to off-world presence and engagement with them. But it is not a cover up as a knee jerk reactionary response to something poohbas and powers-that-be would consider “threats” in the classic X-Files universe sense of the word. There are no Scully and Mulder in the real world. If they were, they would find things confusing because the phenomenon is multiphasic.

There is more than one group with which contact, trading and TTPs (technology transfer programs) takes place. The better known in the public domain is the one mentioned by James, known as the court, because it is the one with the largest footprint and trail. It also happens to be one that has integral compenetration into so many aspects of life on earth it is not even funny anymore. This is also one in which I believe there to be the highest integration of interests coming to the trough represented by the company (a massive proprietary) that licenses the technologies made available to those who pay.

The sucklings are the companies that pay to get some version of technologies that are made available to the unrecognized deep cover unit of no such agency, operating under the aegis of the proprietary. James has intentionally or unintentionally put a fly in the ointment, and the dance since I hear has changed. The tune and tenor is different now, but the elemental signature of all those concerned has remained the same, which to me means it is still business as usual.

The idea of the need of a united front in dealing with off-world groups is a real and viable one, and so is the need – real but not easy to achieve. There are ideas and needs within USG-network circles and ideas and needs within NGOs. Ideas differ according to the side which represents some aspect of USG/network interests, either military or economic.

Ideas in NGO circles also differ according to the definitions given by the specific group, and the vantage points of the NGOs themselves. The need for advanced technology is a given, although circumscribed to developed countries and advanced technology corporate entities. Cost benefit favors those who pay to become recipients of often diluted advanced methods which, still, are more advanced than anything on Earth. The litany of such beneficiaries, while classified by all accounts, is, I’m told, very long and not all of them are American companies.

The other thing to consider in your definition of the problem with ETs is your perception of such as being “fragmented.” Actually, we are the fish and all we see is water. The cognitive means we use to deal with them severely undercut our ability to deal with them: somewhat like using DC-3s to combat people with F-22s. They use a form of topological thinking, which uses a completely different way of structuring thinking architectures such that, as George LoBuono’s experience with transversals and other off-worlders teach us, make human beings less than able to stay the course with them.

We are handicapped by our use of fairly linear thinking styles and by the absence of sufficient neural networks interconnected to allow wide associations, layered considerations of topics, and interconnections between topics. However, all of this can be easily corrected, by using a wider swath of our natural intelligence and all of our brains. Yes, all four of them. More on this later in this commentary.

Here, I want to spend time discussing a short list of imperatives I see we have as human beings, as a biokind, as a civilization, and as a budding galactic member of a (yes, George LoBuono is quite correct) overpopulated galaxy and universe. I am not going to focus on concerns already so ably expressed by George. Instead, I’m going to look at imperatives we must recognize, develop and adopt as working perspectives and utilitarian methods in our dealings with off-worlders.

We, I and my colleagues, have done so, to much profit in gaining a wider, more profound level of grasp and understanding of issues, problems, opportunities and challenges we face with their presence on our planet, the solar system, and their amalgamation into our civilization and society.


From here onward, I quote from an essay I wrote and published on the net some years ago, and from a book in process I am currently writing. (Edit note: Some of the paragraphs were quite long so I broke them up in this treatise from source.)

Since our appearance on the face of the Earth as a sapient biokind (or what Zecharia Sitchin called homo sapiens sapiens), we humans of Earth have been undergoing an evolution of consciousness in spurts of growth, not in a linear fashion. We have been undergoing a kind of evolution in our way of thinking based upon our abilities to become able and comfortable in using our own nervous system with which to manifest these evolving modes of conscious mental and psychophysiological behaviors.

Early on, we deployed a use of our higher mental capabilities in a dualistic fashion: we behaved according to what we could manifest as whole-prehension consciousness (or right-hemispheric thinking) and as emerging intellectual-rational thinking (or left-hemispheric mental behavior). It is this stage that Julian Jaynes referred to as important aspect of bicameral consciousness.

We still do manifest this model of mental behavior in external behaviors that result in fearful conduct, worrying, wars, lack, and more. This is behavior driven by left-hemispheric thinking, intellectually justified and buttressed by the functions and modalities of left-hemispheric thinking modalities and information processing. This is a thinking mode we have come to regard as ego-consciousness, or proprioceptive homo-centered consciousness – a kind of individual and social solipsism.

In other words, left-hemispheric thinking modalities and information processing conceive of the external world as only real through the senses, and that its body consciousness is the boundary to its sense of “reality.” Anything beyond it is not certain to be “real,” unless the left-hemispheric intellectual derivation of what is real is buttressed by some aspect of its information processing of the external event. To a person who thinks in this fashion, UFOs don’t exist unless one lands in front of him or her.

Even a flash appearance of one in the skies that lasts a short while may be explained away or denied, depending upon how the person’s intellectual handling of the information is processed. Extraterrestrial groups on and around near Earth space are aware of the prevalence of this thinking modality in human beings. Therefore, members of these different groups encourage, advance, boost, further, and promote us to develop topological thinking.

Mental/sensorial Multitasking In Serial And In Parallel Modes

So what is it, and how does it work? To explain, we are going to use both left-hemispheric and right-hemispheric language. And then I am going to mix them up into a more fluid explanation.

In the former language set – left-hemispheric – it would be, using computation metaphors, being able to multitask fluidly both in serial and parallel fashions at the same time. By fluidly, we mean that one is able to easily slip initially from one information set (the meanings conveyed by the information flow) into another into another, then another without discomfort, but in an additive fashion.

In right-hemispheric explanation, for every information set one slips into, one adds that into the RAM memory set of one’s being and is able to remember what was processed in sequence and in parallel (from one to the next to the next to the next set), and at the same time also be able to detect, decode and quickly decipher relationships between the information sets, elements thereof, and connect these quickly and effortlessly, reaching and gaining new knowings as one goes forward in thinking in the given flow.

So we don’t “think about;” we think “in the flow” of something that never seems to end, but from which we can disconnect from to begin or enter into another flow. As one “grows” in the modality (i.e., becomes comfortable and at ease in the flow), one is able to retain most, if not all, of the “information set meaning processes” previously undergone while already in the next flow.

How is this possible? Can this be possible for us humans?

It is. When we cease relying on as an exclusively biochemical process and extend into a kind of bioelectronic, photonic memory, our information processing capacities experience a quantum jump of exponential rise. We are able to “store” memories in what we now referred to as our Meissner fields (the photonic field that surrounds our bodies), on the magnetic fields produced by currents that flow through the surfaces of our cells, even in the static charge in our cells themselves.

One must take into consideration that for every electrical charge in our bodies, there are magnetic fields off any tissue at 90 degrees from its surface. These fields are both energy and information. That is, our cells and our Meissner fields are capable of also carrying an information bandwidth in all electrical currents that also produce magnetic fields. All extraterrestrial groups on and in Earth near space have this capacity. And we need to develop it as well. Can we? Of course, we can.

Humans have already started to develop these capacities – some with assistance of energetic technologies that are capable of inducing a greater connectivity between neurons (increasing the neuronal capacity for information processing but only in the central nervous system’s cortical areas of the brain), while others with soft technologies of intelligence acceleration that are slowly coming out into the public domain. A topological thinking modality will allow one to grasp most if not all of what I am saying without any problems, getting the connections between the various concepts in the flow. It is this that is elsewhere referred to as a technology of intelligence acceleration.

Our New Imperative

Topological thinking then becomes the centerpiece of our new imperative. Without it, not much of what else we need to become may be fully connected in one’s mind to grasp where, collectively, we have to move toward. In terms of developing the abilities to connect with those who are not from here, it is necessary to realize early on that to grasp and get who, what, why, and where they are coming from may not be as complete on our part without this new thinking modality.

These people have not only the advantage of possessing topological thinking as a matter of course, but also have the capacity of mind-on-mind resonance via the use of extremely low frequency ranges to connect themselves mentally to us, and to others. In their cases, most of this is done with assistive technologies, some of which I am told we have retroengineered for ourselves, working forward in modifications to the initial Flanagan device and other earlier ones.

Should we then move toward developing topological thinking? We must. It is now not a choice of if, but a choice of when. There is also the expectation that those who choose not to may well be left behind, isolated, and disconnected. It is interesting to note that one particular hyperversal individual entity, with whom we’ve been in contact now for nearly a decade, tells us that we humans are eminently positioned today to develop these capacities because our overall information bandwidth is so much broader than those of extraterrestrials merely relying on mere mental mind-on-mind communication. Or what we know popularly as telepathy.

He tells us that they, themselves, are undergoing a kind of bootstrapping program to reintegrate into their capabilities the capacity to feel deeply, to love and to connect from the solar plexus – or their equivalent of that. It is not altogether surprising then – at least to me and those colleagues of mine who have contact with offworld species – that a majority of them find our emotive bandwidth a little too much to take at times, especially when we emote highly dense, highly charged emotions like anger and frustration.

Toward An Internal Psychophysiological “Soft Engineering” That Goes With Our New Imperative

To put it clearly in plain English, our new imperative is to develop the capacity to think topologically. Equally plain is our need to engineer this new capacity in ourselves. In the remainder of Part 1, let me lay out a bird’s eye view of the internal psychophysiological environment we need to develop to achieve some measure of topological thinking capacity.

It is known today that, as complex biological entities, we lose a lot of energy by the lifestyles we live. Thoughts that engender worry, fear, frustration, anger, and such other truly unnecessary and illogical byproducts of our daily interpretations of our experiences within of the world without, the behavior of others and the attributions we make to events and things that do not work in our lives – these are net energy loss states – thermal and bioelectric.

We need to learn not to want them in our lives, and to not produce them. What is the alternative? Well, in one word, it is the state of peace. We pay to learn to do TM and yoga and other meditation techniques in pursuit of the wellbeing brought about by internal peace – and I’m not just talking about the kicking in of momentary states of relaxation. I’m talking about an ongoing, internally instituted campaign of safeguarding our internal state of peace, because this state is the basis, the psychophysiological environment needed, to begin manifesting topological thinking capacities.

Why peace? Because it is literally a zero-point platform for our biominds (our bodies and minds connected as a working, feeling, sensing, computing tandem) to begin to manifest and act in higher integrated levels of functioning. Our capabilities to sense with all of our senses, to use our skins as literal antennas, our cortical brains as processing mind, and every aspect of the cytoskeleton of our cells and the fascia or connective tissue, are all viable means of perception, reception, and processing of information – albeit, without the spoken language that is the trademark of the cortical mind. Integrated functioning allows us as spirit-body-minds to relax our hearts, our tissues, the coils of our DNA and, energetically, express ourselves into extension well beyond 4-space/time. Just how do you think extraterrestrials set surveillance of our thoughtscapes?

As I was told, their surveillance is focused on the qualitative aspects of the manifest total of human thought at any one second of time, ad infinitum. And they are capable of culling through what they interface from our combined total thought behavior to find trends in them we are not aware we are producing. We broadcast powerfully – with all the means at our disposal I’ve described above – in more than just our 4-space/time Earth: our broadcast reaches realms in which energy is negative and matter is dark. Each one of our cells act like literal miniature black holes, and the sum total of our capacities when integrally manifest reaches octavials beyond our imagination.

So how do we harness this panoply of capacities into an engineer-able vector? How do we use our biomind as a highly amplified topological thinking powerhouse?

We start by learning how to work with our attention – broad external, broad internal, narrow external and narrow internal.

Attention is to grasping meaning and understanding what the eyes are to looking and seeing. Attention and sight are both propelled by an energetics that is often too low in power to measure (but it can be and has been), yet we can feel the eyes of a person looking at us from behind; we feel it in the back of our necks.

We deploy energy when we look and also deploy energy when we pay attention. But something funny happens to the energetic scale when we add a vectored intention to the mix: the scale goes off the chart! Something even more amazing happens when we pay attention in a peaceful state with a vector of intention: we can grasp as far as the nearest star (figuratively speaking)!

Something else also happens that we are just beginning to understand: all three-plus trillion cells align their electromagnetic fields to function much like an external drive in a computer. In other words, this results in a kind of additional computing capacity for the human biomind. It is like the networking of three-plus billion minicomputers in series and in parallel.

What can this upgrade in thinking produce? Well, if we go by what happens to children who are now coming on line, as it were, manifesting themselves as a leading edge of our evolution, quite a q-byte (tongue-in-cheek). Take, for instance, Mary Rodwell’s report on such children (add here link to

Tibetan, Indian (from India) and Mexican children develop a kind of sign language with which they communicate among themselves and with extraterrestrials. (Two members of our scientific cooperative, funded by a private foundation, have been looking at this phenomenon for the past two years.) They report overt complex behaviors we can only understand as clairvoyant, psychokinetic and mind-on-mind telepathic.


In a manner of preface, it must be said with all weight lend to the words used that the defense of our biology is both against HAVs, as well as invisible forces manipulated by these offworlders directly, indirectly, and by ideological means. While direct and indirect influence and control is the subject of another essay, a brief examination of ideology manipulated by these forces that do affect our biology is here in order.

The ideology in question, both equally reality as well as life condition to fourth fifths of humankind, is rampant, heartless capitalism. The corollary idea of human capital gets literally into our biological ‘pockets,’ turning each of us into replaceable parts of large corporate and industrial machines. It is the biological ‘pockets’ which are of eminent human concern for, in paying the piper for the privilege of earning a living, we get wooden nickels – paper money only backed by the economic soundness of the sector cartels, which altogether we know as national economies.

This is a keiretzu mentality that lives in hierarchical pyramids, which also serve as model for the stratification of entire social orders. In short, our biology is at stake, not only from the home front side, but also from the impressive designs of certain offworld aliens bent on hegemony over our world and our biology.

The right to defend our biology

There is much to be said about our defense of our own biology – a biology few people today have the broad picture, even scientists.

A right to defend our own biology? Yes. This is a “right” implicit to the thinking of all invited and observer extraterrestrial members of the Link. It is also a “right” yet poorly understood by human members, invited and observers alike. Do people of Earth understand the meaning of this “right” in the larger, galactic sense of the phrase? It is quite apparent, we do not. Therefore, in this chapter, I would like to explore the facets and phases of what this “right” implies and the biology we are to defend.

According to current paleoanthropological thinking, human beings have appeared on the face of the Earth some two million-plus years ago. We are said to be the product of a progression of evolutionary development. Here, however, I am not going to promote or endorse any one theory of evolution, because, from my point of view, none offer complete accounting for how homo sapiens sapiens came to be. What I will attempt to do is to offer insight into what it means to defend our biology, regardless of when, how, under what circumstances, and who were involved in our appearance on Earth. I will depart from the thought that we appeared, we are here, and we have a biology to use in service to the common of all human beings on Earth, and defend.

The Leading Edges Of Our Evolution

As biological entities, extraterrestrials know and understand (at least those who still depend upon their biological form to live in the universe) that their biology is the basis of their evolutionary manifestations. Off-world groups report they meet external challenges to their biokind by developmental contingencies manifest in the fold of their biology. They know and understand what living habitat requirements their biology has in order for each living form to continue to manifest life in the body. They also know what biological responses their bodies must perform to exigencies – sudden unforeseen challenges – faced by them under new, unexpected habitat conditions, planetary changes, and other urgent situations that threaten their biology, short of having to leave their ancestral planetary homes and move to a new one.

Additionally, when potentially catastrophic exigencies become apparent over time, e.g., living on a planet in a star system that is part of a galaxy that is being taken apart and engulfed by the stronger gravitational pull of another larger one, the range of choices for meeting this kind of challenge involves the need for time and information on the range of choices itself.

This has happened to more than one off-world group in the past, according to our records of conference proceedings. By the same token, there are often biological responses which the biology itself of the affected off-world group may contribute and help the life form meet the challenges better, ensuring the survival of the biokind. All of what I am saying now is predicated on what most, if not all, extraterrestrial biokinds have reported in the course of conferences: the common (the biomind of the entire biokind) acts externally and biologically in the best interest of the biokind, so that it may continue to survive and thrive as a civilization. This is a condition also predicated on the availability of important survival information to all members of the biokind.

When examined from the viewpoint of the kinds of response sets of off-world groups to exigencies and potentially catastrophic challenges to their home and their survival, humankind is at this time grossly unprepared to meet forthcoming Earth challenges to its integrity and structure, and consequently not conformed optimally for human survival and biological viability.

The most severe obstacle to optimal survival and biological viability is the absence of accurate, valid and species-wide information on upcoming planetary challenges to Earth and the human race on it. Humankind is also at a stark disadvantage at this juncture in its biological evolution, having achieved an amazing level of intelligence and technological achievement in merely 350,000+ years of existence as homo sapiens sapiens. Yet, its development of the common (biokind as a unified biomind) lags far behind its intellectual and technological achievements to date.

There are, however, growing indications of positive mutations in human beings able to function in an integrated fashion. By integrated I mean an organismic configuration of neural, enteromyofascial, cytoskeletal, and low voltage energetic functioning that makes them literally plugged into a kind of larger mind – that is, they are far better interconnective than the man or woman on the street. These people are noticed, primarily because their organisms and biominds work seamlessly internally, generating information that is consciously used by the individual for life quality, safety, survival and intellectual purposes, and externally, for interconnectivity purposes – to know if there is a highway patrol over the next hill so as to slow down and avoid getting a ticket, to know when someone thinks about this person, to identify the phone caller and know who is on the other end of the line before picking up the receiver, and much more.

Much of this latter behavior is often attributed to intuition and so-called ESP. Actually, it is not anomalous behavior, in the sense today defined and attributed by present day science. On the contrary, it appears to be a logical and necessary expansion of a kind of energetic metagenome that is literally superposed upon all DNA when manifest in spacetime.

Let me explain what I meant in the last paragraph. It is necessary that you gain a clear understanding of the preceding. It is a highly technical area, but I will make an attempt at clarifying things without using too many technical terms. In the next paragraphs we will explore together the meaning of what biology we must preserve and defend.

Over many millennia, the human body and the human mind have moved on a upward curve of biogenetic development and an evolution of mind. At this juncture in our evolution, we are finding ourselves moving forward with a leading edge of the evolutionary curve – human beings capable of seemingly astounding things.

These emerging capacities are not only as intelligence manifested in intellectual pursuits; they are also forms of intelligence that integrate the various manifestations of abilities and capabilities of a human being – an ability to love, to connect to another in subtle yet real ways not diminished by physical distance, the capability to sense the presence of another at a distance and know the wellbeing or discomfort of the other, the ability to see inside the human body without even having to be in the same room as the target, a capacity for emotion that often scares off-world people in its intensity and misuses by a human experiencer, an ability and capacity for music and art, a deeply and often abiding sense of the eternal and spiritual, a profound love for progeny, and a seemingly endless ability I believe wired in to generate, evolve, manifest and misuse culture. All of these manifestations of being human lie, in our opinion and in the opinion of those off-world conference participants, somewhere between our biogenetic legacy and the underdeveloped human biomind.

Our DNA have unique bioelectronic signatures, which hold the keys to both positive and negative mutations. A couple of years ago, Joseph Wang, director of the Center for Bioelectronics and Biosensors at the Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, led a team effort that successfully merged work in the fields of biosensors, electronics, and nanotechnology to fashion nanocrystals that can act as “DNA biosensors” by electronically recognizing subtle mutations in human DNA.

This creates enormous potential for applications such as the diagnosis and treatment of genetic diseases, detection of infectious agents and reliable forensic analysis. Among the keys to unearthing the mysteries behind individual genetic variation and diseases like cancer are fine differences — single nucleotide polymorphisms, or “SNPs” — buried within the 3 billion chemical bases of DNA comprising the human genome. Not every SNP found will necessarily cause a mutation or determine our eye or hair color — but, on average, SNPs occur about once in every 1,000 DNA bases, adding up to 3 million potential individual differences across the human genome. Wang’s method allows for an accurate, ultra-sensitive, rapid and low-cost identification of these SNP variants.

Technological means are not the only way to detect and decipher effects through the biosignature of our DNA. Recently, some interesting work by a couple of Russian scientists (who published a book) came along so much along the same lines as the work done by Finnish, German, Russian and American scientists associated with the Journal of Non-Local & Remote Mental Interactions (JNL&RMI).

In their book Vernetzte Intelligenz, Grazyna Gosar and Franz Bludorf (so far only published in German), they characterize human DNA as a biological “internet” and superior in many aspects to the electronic one. There is evidence for a whole new type of medicine in which DNA can be influenced and reprogrammed by words and frequencies without cutting out and replacing single genes. Only 10% of our DNA is being used for building proteins. It is this subset of DNA that is of interest to western researchers and is being examined and categorized. The other 90% are considered “junk DNA.” The Russian researchers, however, convinced that nature was not wasteful, joined linguists and geneticists in a venture to explore the 90% of “junk DNA.” Their results, findings and conclusions are simply revolutionary.

According to their findings, our DNA is not only responsible for the construction of our body but also serves as data storage and communication. The Russian linguists found that the genetic code – especially in the apparent “useless” 90%” — follows the same rules as those of our human languages. They found that the alkalines of our DNA follow a regular grammar and do have set rules just like our languages. Therefore, human languages did not appear coincidentally but are a reflection of our inherent DNA.

The Russian biophysicist and molecular biologist Pjotr (Peter) Garjajev (Gariaev) and his colleagues also explored behavior of DNA under exposure to frequencies of light and sound. They concluded that “living chromosomes function just like a holographic computer using endogenous DNA laser radiation.” This means that they managed, for example, to modulate certain frequency patterns (sound) onto a laser-like ray which influenced DNA frequency and thus the genetic information itself.

Since the basic structure of DNA-alkaline pairs and human languages are similar, if not identical, DNA decoding is automatized. One can simply use words and sentences of the human language. This, too, was examined experimentally to levels of confidence well beyond the .01 level. Living DNA substance (in living tissue, not in vitro) will always react to language-modulated laser rays and even to radio waves, if the proper frequencies (sound) are being used.

This lends weight to the explanation for why affirmations, hypnosis and other psychomotive methods can have such strong effects on the human mind and body. It is entirely normal and natural for our DNA to react to language. While western researchers cut single genes from DNA strands and insert them elsewhere, the Russians enthusiastically created devices that influence cellular metabolism through modulated radio and light frequencies, thus repairing genetic defects. They even captured information patterns of a particular DNA and transmitted it onto another, thus reprogramming cells to another genome.

So they successfully transformed, for example, frog embryos to salamander embryos simply by transmitting the DNA information patterns! In this manner, the entire information was transmitted without any of the side effects or disharmonies encountered when cutting out and re-introducing single genes from the DNA.

This represents new level of knowledge and soft technology: by simply applying vibration (sound frequencies) and language instead of a surgical genetic procedure, we can actually affect our own DNA. These experiments point to the real capabilities of wave genetics, which we now know has greater influence on the formation of organisms than the biochemical processes of alkaline sequences alone. There are additional examples:

An Experiment By Dr. Vladimir Poponin. A container was emptied of air, so the only thing left was electromagnetic field. Poponin measured the energy distribution inside the container and found it was completely random. Then some DNA was placed inside the container and the field distribution was again measured. This time the energy was organized in an ordered way aligned with the DNA. In other words the ‘physical’ DNA is connected to the ‘non-physical’ energy field. Shortly thereafter, the DNA was removed from the container and the order was measured again. The field remained ordered with the arrangement created by the DNA.

Experimental Work at the Institute of HeartMath. Some human placental DNA (the most pristine form of DNA) was placed in a container from which Institute could measure changes. Twenty-eight vials of DNA were given (one each) to 28 trained researchers. Each researcher had been trained how to generate and feel feelings, and they each had strong emotions. What was discovered was that the DNA changed its shape in accordance to the feelings of the researchers:

1. When the researchers felt gratitude, love and appreciation, the DNA responded by relaxing and the strands unwound. The DNA strands became longer.

2. When the researchers felt anger, fear, frustration, or stress, the DNA responded by tightening up. It became shorter and switched off many of our DNA codes.

The shut down of the DNA codes was reversed and the codes were switched back on again when feelings of love, joy, gratitude and appreciation were felt by the researchers. Individuals trained in deep love were able to change the shape of their DNA. This recognizes energy or field as the connector of all creation, a tightly woven web that connects all seeming materiality. We’re able to participate in the web of creation through our operating frequency range at the moment. THIS is how we can create our reality – by choosing it with our feelings. Get yourself into feelings of joy, love, peace, healing, patience, respect, appreciation, wonder and gratitude — and focus on bringing that to our whole re-connecting world.

Experiments By The United States Army. Leukocytes (white blood cells) were collected for DNA from donors and placed into chambers so scientists could measure electrical changes in the samples. In one experiment, the donor was placed in one room and subjected to video clips, which were designed to generate different emotions in the donor. The DNA was in a different room in the same building. Both the donor and the subject’s DNA were monitored. As the donor exhibited emotional peaks or valleys (measured by electrical responses), the DNA exhibited the identical responses.

The military wanted to see how far away they could separate the donor from his DNA and still get this effect. They stopped testing after they separated the DNA and the donor by 50 miles, as the results continued to be the same. The DNA and the donor had the same identical responses. It means that life everywhere communicates through the Earth’s extremely low frequency electromagnetic field.

Our Biology: Much More Than Just A Genomic Blueprint

Until quite recently, it was widely held that individual genes directly controlled physical traits in the human body (even mental and behavioral traits, according to some experts). Now we know that a surprisingly large number of people have wild variations in their genetic code, such as multiple copies of the same gene, and entire genes missing from their DNA. Yet they are not walking around without a left lung, an arm, or missing all their nails. It is all quite shocking, at least from a Western scientific point of view, that merely 30,000+ genes are all that is necessary to build a human being.

There is definitely something wrong with the view that DNA is like a computer program containing sequential instructions for building a physical organism. In the current paradigm, there are not enough genes in the human genome to even build a human being. Yet, here we are. A human has about 30,000 genes, yet an adult human has trillions of specialized cells governed by millions of different chemical reactions. How do 30,000 genes control all these cells and all of their functions?

In 2001, we believed we had 100,000 genes and that simpler life forms had far fewer. Our view of ourselves as some “higher life form” by the presumed genomic complexity in comparison to assumed “lesser” complex life forms turned out to be quite wrong.

It turns out the mustard weed contains the same number of genes as humans, and the common mouse has nearly as many. From certain types of worms to common trees, there are many organisms on the planet that have very nearly the same number of genes as human beings (and some have even more). Even more surprising, human beings appear to actually be human-bacteria hybrids.

At least 200 genes in our genetic code were mysteriously borrowed from bacteria. No one is sure how they got there, but we are sure that they are there. Furthermore, if we were to look at the composition of cells in the typical human body, and started counting them all, one would realize that most of the cells in the typical human body are not human. Shocking, isn’t it? Yet, it is every bit true. The vast majority of cells in the human body are actually bacteria cells — some 100 trillion of them for a typical human being.

The important lesson in all of this is in understanding that the human organism does not exist in isolation to the world around it. Regardless of what we believe, we are all closer to Earth nature than we think. In fact, we are literally living with such nature inside us, permeating our cells and accounting for more of us than we realize.

There’s also no mention of epigenetics in any discussion of the human genome. We have recently learned, much to our surprise, that epigenetic factors control the expression of genes, activating or deactivating them based on environmental factors such as nutrition or exposure to synthetic chemicals and electromagnetic fields. Epigenetic factors are inherited and passed from generation to generation – a mother born with a mutated gift for prophecy when she conceives a child, the prophetical side effects of that gift will be passed down through multiple generations (at least four generations, according to some, but perhaps as many as seven according to others).

The same thing with malnutrition, or intelligence. Why the mother? It is she who passes on her mitochondrial DNA to her child, male and female. And yet, DNA is not the only archive of information that passes from mother to child. Even if we understood everything about DNA, we would still lack the big picture unless we also understood epigenetic factors. What we must do to avoid it is to stop adhering to the outlandish and outdated point of view that genes alone control everything, and that all disease and all gifts are predetermined, with environmental factors having little or no effect.

The Biowave Genome We Must Defend

So what lays beyond the current notion that the human genome is sort of like a biological computer program, a mere series of instructions that tells the cells how to construct a complete organism containing trillions of new cells? There are no clear theories as yet on how a mere 30,000 genes could account for the construction, maintenance and continuous operation of such a highly complex organism. Or for the organically produced energetic fields that emanate from all cell, which join as a single degree of freedom field ancient teachers then, and we now, know as the human aura. Or by its more technical name – the human Meissner-antiMeissner field. But there are now hints. This new paradigm is often referred to as biowave genetics, and variations thereof.

One aspect that whatever new paradigm supplants the present one must also take into consideration the multiple copies of many genes that have now been observed across a wide spectrum of the human population. Some people carry one, two, three or even four copies of the same gene. Interestingly, these are the human beings with least diseases, major or otherwise. We won’t find many of them in hospitals and clinics, seeking treatment for what ails the rest of us.

The natural progression of our biowave evolution provides, interestingly enough, for some of the mechanisms that allows the seemingly strange presence of more than one gene in a human being. Let me compare this phenomenon to the sound of a guitar or a piano. A complex sound such as a single note on a piano is not made up of a simple square wave tone, but is made up of highly complex harmonics which give the piano its own tone and timbre, a kind of distinct auditory personality. How do we know this? On an oscilloscope, they often appear as copies of the same underlying waveforms. They are also known as overtones. So, to offer a model (originally shared with us during a presentation at one of the annual conferences) applicable to human biology, let me use music as the medium of conveyance.

The physical biowave biology and genetics of a human being can be likened to a host of musical expression, rather than the mere applications of rules in a relatively static blueprint. When we examine the near perfect symmetry of the human body, at its surface and inside its domains, we see economies of scale and expression. There is fractal artistry in the way arteries and veins are patterned in the body. Epithelial (skin) cells in the fingertips do another form of artistry, governed by an invisible field that tells them how to form unique patterns we know as fingerprints.

Throughout the human body, from the lining of the cells of the stomach to the structure of the eye, you find patterns that go way beyond the mere application of blueprints to a biological canvass. The human body is a literal symphony as a grand musical masterpiece played out in billions of variations on every corner of our Earth.

The human DNA, it now theorized, is a holographic invisible from which the billions of genetic combination make a whole human being. The repeating patterns of genes and the symmetry of the double helix are all expressions of a music we are beginning to understand. The human genome is the symphony, and it is through this symphony that the music of life is played. Combined with environmental and energetic factors (such as parental love, interconnecting acceptance and openness), the symphony of human DNA creates a physical being. Yet, it is not all there is. It also creates the framework of an emotional being, an energetic entity and a spiritual (interconnecting) biomind.

This is music a rationalist neither hears nor, if he or she could, would understand. To a rationalist, a human being is an anatomy and physiology that can be understood only in their comparments, separated by tradition and by training. To such a mind, there is no connection between living things, and creatures large and small are nothing more than players in cruel game proudly called survival of the fittest.

Instead, we say we are all uniquely creative expressions of a universal music we are beginning to hear. In this vein, it is very interesting that some off-world groups identify another member of the group by a combination of electromagnetic and sound signatures. DNA is yet a mystery, much like a good symphony, or a novel, or the collection of poetry of some grand designer. So, if words were genes, by using the frameworks of expression that guide each word, we could have a whole human being. To make the foregoing more apparent, let’s use an example that will clarify things globally. In the box below, all words represent a gene.

Can you make any sense of the separate letters of the human being that is formed from all of them? The scrabbled form above is the way in which scientists today look at the human genome; each “word” stands by itself, for the purpose of guiding the formation of a structure to which it is believed to be correlated only by a biochemistry said to govern everything else. Scientists today even use the term “words” to describe genes, describing the variations in the protein sequences as different “spellings” of those words. Yet, they completely miss the grammar of those words: the music, the poetry, the linguistics. So let me take those same words (genes) and rearrange them to reveal poetry, thanks to poetry of its creator, Robert Frost:

Fire and Ice

Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.

They are the same words scattered linearly inside the box above, but now suddenly they create something complex and intelligent, for more than the simple sum of their parts. Through the arrangement of the symphony of the words, Robert Frost takes us to the meaning of life itself, and the end of the world as we know it. All is brought forth by a set of words, meaningless when isolated, absent the context of their interrelationships, their holographic relationships in the whole.

Albeit made a metaphor above, it is the same thing with our biology and the biominds we are. It is this the biology we are, that we have, that we must defend against all enemies, off-world and earthly. It is this biology from and through which our species interconnects within itself, and interconnects to all other biokinds in the universe. It is also the biology that underpins the HumanOne and the HumanOrg envisioned on the pages of THE LINK, my forthcoming book.


From the outset, let’s establish clearly that what, in the popular UFO literature is referred to as “the government,” does not work in quite as monolithic a way as assumed, for profitable CE5s (close encounters of the fifth kind) are not through an organism of governance that is massive, rigid, and totally uniform. In fact, often it will not even involve the executive arm of government itself – except for the intelligence group operating within the umbrella SCI that is involved in any one of three types of CE5s: quid pro quos, TTPs, or outright piracy arrangements. This is often the case because of a penchant to avoid exposure and oversight (the latter when public monies may be involved in a given arrangement).

Thus, the less public officials know about above black (astro, cosmic and other high classification level) projects, the less they can disclose when in a political situation that may place them in a position of having to do so. This is evident from the fiction and nonfiction works of such writers as Michael Wolf and Phillip Corso, two insiders who knew how things worked.

Some CE5s involve just one of the three, while others are TTPs inside quid pro quos. Another arrangement is the pirate tradeoff conducted within a quid pro quo with one or another intelligence/corporate groups higher in the astral contact food chain. Finally, there is the popular TTP inside a piracy agreement. And these are only the ones that I was able to decipher so far.

It is known through contact field work with members of extraterrestrial groups already on the surface that, broadly speaking, governance (that is, governmental organisms in the United States, Europe, Russia, China, and other major powers) is involved, often albeit tangentially, but broadly informed of quid pro quos and TTPs and pirate arrangements. In fact, it is pirate arrangements that will often involve governmental units, usually with the full awareness and consent of lower echelon in the executive branch (part of the “don’t-know, can’t tell,” “don’t ask, won’t tell,” and plausible deniability strategies commonly used).

However, for the sake of fairness, it should be made clear that in nearly all of such arrangements, the executive branch is at worst powerless to fight the arrangement, or de-motivated to do anything due to often tangential gains made in the deal. Sources in the literature as well as human-extraterrestrial contacts on the ground have corroborated the substance of the previous statements.

No two arrangements will be or function in identical fashion to others. The human equivalent would be to say that these are business-like arrangements in the literal sense of the phrase. The keys to the functioning of any such arrangements, from our viewpoint, appear to be several. They seem to involve the power level of the participants, the imperatives of each of the parties, and the level of need of each in relation to what the other brings to the negotiating, and then the “workshop” or field operation table.

These considerations are often weighty, and seem to take the bulk of the negotiating time between the parties. The imponderable in this mix is, almost always, the level of trust between them, mostly framed by the relationship between the parties and the communication style of the extraterrestrial group. For instance, the least trusted of the Messier groups (extragalactic groups coming from identified Messier galaxies) is the gray band, composed of several groups that are described as “mentally aggressive” in the course of contact, as well as during any negotiation. Yet, not all grays are said to be that way.

Although technically not extragalactic, the sauroid grays from the Zeta Reticuli in our Milky Way are subjugates to another life form of extragalactic origin. Being nonsexual, their mind-on-mind (MOM) communication style is altogether different than, say, that of the Verdants (a sexually reproductive group), or the Elders. These differences in communication styles are examined in great detail in my forthcoming book.

Sociopolitical relationships and lessons for us

It is interesting, as a quick aside here, that extraterrestrial groups operating in near Earth space maintain relationships among themselves roughly classifiable as subjugate (when one holds control over the other by technological superiority, sheer numbers, expansionistic policy, or panspermic “rights”), conjugates (when control is not the preeminent issue between two or more groups, and imperatives-driven political initiatives are), and synjugates (that is, groups such as what we have come to call the Link, driven by intragroup policies that establish a common interest across many issues, that choose to come together in a kind of adhocracy, or adhoc grouping according to a prevalence of need). In all of the sociopolitical arrangements mentioned above, the underlying energetic thread that drives the formation and formulation of the arrangement is the group imperative(s) inscribed as group policy.

It is my distinct impression that, while for some the issue of control is eminent in their policies and sociopolitical strategies, it is such groups that tend to present the most problematic of situations to all groups in this and other galaxies; the problem is an ecological one, but not just in the sense of an ecology as we think of here on Earth. The expanded view of galactic ecology involves the uses and misuses of what is now known as electrogravity. I examine this scientific issue and the problems associated with its misuse by certain extraterrestrial populations as a grave ecological problem in Chapter 11 of my forthcoming book.

As to population statistics, I don’t have anything to contribute here, except to say that, from what those in the group I belong to have heard in the course of the annual conferences (four in a row for myself), the numbers offered by both journalists (Phil Krapf and George LoBuono.) seem to be ballpark figures. However, I don’t have any comparison figures to dispute, correct, or advance new numbers on the matter.

Conjugate and synjugate alien groups represent much of our hope for ourselves as a biokind, in my view. When two or more groups come together in a kind of political arrangement in pursuit of conjugate political objectives, these groups seem to become a grid of control, coordination and cooperative deployment of assets and presence directed in unison at the objective. The objective may be, as it was more than once reported during the course of the annual conferences I attended, wayward planets or locally expansionary populations taking up life-bearing planets for themselves at the expense of other populations, developing civilizations on planets abusing electrogravity indiscriminately, extending technology transfer to other planets as equalizing measures against hegemony by competing ones, and more.

The Link, however, has all the makings of a synjugate arrangement between several groups coming together for a common goal. In what I here (and the scientific cooperative I belong to) call The Link, the arrangement is ad hoc; that is, these group came together by seeming common interests and prevalence of needs, based on similar group imperatives. There are no formal treaties between them, or with us for that matter, for the conferences to take place. They just do.

Each of the extraterrestrial groups organize them, a different one each year; only three times were they arranged and organized by Earth participant groups. The organizing group for the year sends out announcements by gnosive MOM means and by more mundane means – internet and telephone (if and when possible), messenger (most likely), and letters (where possible).

There are lessons for the humankind Biomind in all of these arrangements. But from the outset, it must be made clear here that the analysis that follows is neither a condemnation or condoning of what already exists. They do, and there isn’t very much we can do to undo them. What we can, and should consider, is to learn from what already is and adapt what is already familiar to extraterrestrial groups to begin doing the same with the “unofficial” human biomind, by way of organized nongovernmental organizations with a Biomind-wide awareness of human imperatives, which can then be taken seriously with those extraterrestrial groups open to direct contact with organisms such as what is proposed in this book. This is precisely what is, at present, from the conferencing and field tables of discussion and exchange – something we will often hear from them as harangues to get ourselves together.


Alvin Toffler, the noted 1970s futurist, once mentioned that future generations would gather in special interest groups he called adhocracies. Adhocracies today go by various names, all leading to the same result (people coming together drawn by a commonality of awareness and interests on issues, problems and opportunities), and they are formalized as unions, societies, groups, associations, nonprofit organizations and such other names that denote the purpose ascribed to the actionable points of view of people assembled by a commonality of interests in a given area.

Toffler’s adhocracy concept may then well be the most powerful, decentralized way of conforming a future HumanOrg that can deal itself into the current picture of negotiations and discussions with extraterrestrial groups interested in such contact arrangements. Moreover, there is nothing that would prevent such adhocracies from forming a representative organism (HumanOrg) with which to speak with one voice and be taken seriously on the playing field. Our analysis of current human affairs indicates that humankind is already aware of the tools, but yet not fully aware of their potential and dynamics uses with regard to the extraterrestrial challenges we face.

Another lesson in this field is that adhocracies would have to be based on membership numbers – not in the hundreds, or thousands, or even hundreds of thousands, but in the millions – a seemingly daunting task, yet not an impossible one. To begin approaching the idea with a consciousness of actionable intention, we can take umbrage and transform the anger into an actionable plan based on the vision already expressed, albeit fictionally, by W. P. Kinsella (in his book) and by Phil Alden Robinson (screenplay), in the movie Field of Dream – “Build it and they will come.” But, build what?

To answer the question, we must now look at the mechanics, dynamics and organization of the kinds of govorg/extraterrestrial arrangements mentioned above. In all of them, regardless of the power relationships between the members in the arrangement, the governmental/corporate adhocracies are based upon exchange, trade and tradeoffs. In more ways than one, these appear to use a fluid, field-of-mind approach to the formalized arrangement and to the way in which the exchanges, trading, and tradeoffs are conducted.

There is always something ET groups need or want, something gov/corp-orgs want in exchange, and therein come the tradeoffs –mostly for the latter, who are often in the lesser-power position from which to negotiate any trade. The results are TTPs, quid pro quos, and look-the-other-way arrangements, often too imbued with a fear-driven and almost fatalistic we-can’t-stop-them-so-they-will-do-what-they-want-anyway mindset in the gov/corp-orgs involved in the arrangements. Whether real or merely perceived by human counterparts, extraterrestrial pirate group intentions govern the nature, power inequality, trade substance, and tradeoffs for the receiving gov/corp-orgs participating in them. And we know them to manage by using force in gradients that appear commensurate to the infraction – a hit here, a disappearance there, an abduction or a series of them, the terrorizing of families of the infraction perpetrators to gain control of their hearts, minds and behavior – often conducted by the security forces of the lesser in the power relationship: the gov/corp-orgs – and more. Any such campaign in place is designed to instill compliance through fear and inaction by anticipation of consequences.

In beneficent arrangements – and yes, there are some – the mechanics, dynamics and organization are similar. There are imperatives on both sides. Usually the extraterrestrial group will make the initial approach. Initial negotiations ensue. An arrangement is forged. An action site (i.e., a place where both groups can safely work together) is found and personnel from both groups assigned and deployed. An infrastructure of exchange is created. If a TTP is involved, the technology is assigned within the technology development/technology retroengineering grid.

Tight security controls are instituted from the start. An economic infrastructure is established (or assigned) to meet the fiscal and technologic needs of the new “program.” A management team is put in place and fiscal/operational controls are instituted. And the program is under way. Meanwhile, the extraterrestrial group harvests what it negotiated to get, and the gov/corp-org involved gets what it covets most – technologic means and some degree of ascendancy in the contact food chain. In the final decades of the 20th century, this “food chain” has turned into a veritable Gantt-type grid, controlled and operated by an unaccountable group within one of the top agencies of the U.S. government – the Labyrinth Group within the NSA.

What lessons lie therein?

It is said that the best kind of flattery is to copy what is already done. Another saying goes, “if it is not broken, don’t fix it.” Dispensing with all New Age nonsense about why extraterrestrials are here, we need to ask ourselves – what do they need while in our neighborhood? The answer to this question is most obvious to anyone with an entrepreneurial mind: sustenance in the form of food and potable water, materiel (objects we produce from adapted technologies to suitable Earth materials) and materials of a specific nature (technology [believe it or not], sand, mined ore, water and other supplies).

In ways not suspected in the public domain, the dependency on the part of more than one extraterrestrial group on suppliers from Earth is near complete. In fact, a whole secret “supply industry” has sprung over the last 40 years in this country, South America, southeast Asia, and the steppes of Russia. The catch is that production is to the buyer’s specifications. Animal protein supplies range from bull meat, goat milk and meat, poultry (including chickens, turkey, geese, Cornish hens and wild turkeys), and fish (mostly farmed salmon and trout); vegetable consumption centers around garden vegetable varieties, maize and corn meal to specification, fruits, raw unprocessed honey, all varieties of nuts, olives and olive oil, raw bark chips from specified trees (for teas, purgatives and diuretics), herbs and spices (all kinds, especially Chinese), and beer-making materials.

Certain extraterrestrial groups are known to like good beer (which to them appears to be heavy but pasteurized Pilsner-types) and products of good vine (all types of wines). Does anyone see opportunity here? The question becomes: what are their specifications? Who the buyers are for each of the groups? And, how often and how much?

If you think I am crazy, think again. This is already going on. There are people already producing things to group specs, and likely don’t know they are doing so for extraterrestrials. On occasion, their inspectors will come to the production site to get a close up view of how things are done on the workshop floor. Here is an opportunity: there is no “approved list” of producers. Their buyers are likely to be located in Miami or Cedar Rapids, Iowa, or somewhere in the states of Rio Grande do Norte or Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Some are plugged into the grid; others are completely oblivious about whom they serve. And not all producers are part of large food manufacturing and packaging companies.

To do business with them, however, is not a matter of picking up the Yellow Pages, looking up under “Extraterrestrial Providers,” and calling a number. This is the reason we used Kinsella and Robinson’s metaphor – “Build it and they will come.” Build what? A network of worldwide producers (as nongovorgs) aligned with what we earlier referred to as HumanOrg – a kind of umbrella organization for nongovernmental organizations learning how to act in synchronous and synjugate fashion, as what we would call the “one-degree of freedom” organization or alignment of human groups acting as one.

The door to business with extraterrestrial groups, we were told at last year’s conference, will initially be through field contacts and in our opinion, ultimately, through HumanOrg. There are some knowledgeable, experienced and shrewd field human operatives at present who can well assist in the forging of trade relationships. I was told by one of my extraterrestrial informants that trade – an almost universal activity upon which entire galactic and intergalactic economies are based – was an avenue to contact, raising relaxation zones, and widening comfort levels between the various extraterrestrial groups and us.

It is expected that human organizations not aligned with govorgs, set up to trade with extraterrestrials, will become engage in trading relationships with them first, before any synjugation (coming into a singularity of purpose) begins to occur. Synjugation may well have to be the product of an organized conspiracy on behalf of the human race by humans in alignment with such groups that adapt to, accept, and honor our own declared imperatives.

There are problems along the way to human synjugation. Not all extraterrestrial groups think highly of us. Some regard us as not better than lab rats, others as food, and still others as children growing up. Almost universally, all of them fear our bicamerality of mind, the license we give to their expression in our daily lives, and results we create by their effects on our interaction with each other – wars, lack, pestilence, hunger, and other byproducts of human degrees of separation. There is also much homework we must do as a biokind and biomind. The word ‘homework’ is used here as the educational metaphor that may guide our transformation. Another may be to evolve by choice.

A more proper and accurate metaphor in what we must make happen would be bootstrap evolution. An aspect of it is to transform our beliefs about the existence of extraterrestrial life – from something we would only believe if one of them landed on the lawn of the White House and said, “Take me to your leader,” to one more realistic and more substantial. As a start, we need to deWheatleysize ourselves from thinking that the only “aliens” have big black eyes and abduct humans as some part of a hybridization program. Not that this is not true and happening, it is and it has in the past. But it is not the whole picture and nothing but the truth, so help us all.

What follows must include the notion that there are others who are not from here who look exactly like us, others who are sauroid-looking, and more. The United States Government, at least the parts of it commissioned to deal with these visitors, know them and know the various biotypes here. They know their biologies and social structures, origin and numbers. This is knowledge held so secret that only those awarded the Astro and Cosmic level of classified access at the least, and higher levels, may know and learn about as subjects of study – exobiology, exopolitics, exosocial dynamics, exothreat, and more. Much is already known in these circles. This is the main reason that the bulk of humankind as the biomind of Earth must also know and learn about them. We suggest in this chapter, and in chapter to come, that the way to get to know them is by interaction and interface with them on frameworks of mutual interest.

They know our “bad side,” as it were. Now it is time they also know the best of who and what we are. And to know us, we must first know ourselves as the best we are and can become to be.


The transition of the mammalian life form that became complex enough to express intelligence, that is us as homo sapiens sapiens (or Thinking Man) has not entirely been left to nature and to chance. There is considerable archeotechnical and archeoanthropological evidence that, not only did we come out of eastern Africa, but that a “lab” existed both above ground and underground north of the Ngorongoro area in Tanzania. I was once part of a team examining these remnants, and very interesting pieces of evidence were found at these sites. The work done by the Leakeys was a kind of semifinal nail on that cross, followed by mitochondrial DNA evidence of an Eve some 250,000-plus years ago, and the distribution of genetic haplogroups across the Earth simply went far in convincing us (especially me) that it all started there, and went out from there.

Interestingly, there is sufficient evidence too, now, that our genome is not only evolving at high speed, but that it also has commonalities with those of other intelligent life forms that have relationships (as TTP or technology transfer programs) with various organs of our government (and others across the world). It seems that, once upon a time, there was something of a pristine, “genesis DNA” of sorts. But that’s beyond the scope of our little discussion here. What is not, however, is the set of differences in rate and range of expression between DNA from offworld intelligent life forms (some, not all I know about) and ours.

Even among us humans today, the rate of expression is a significant factor in discriminating between people who live sanely and healthily, and people who live driven by fear and self-repression. We know now that interaction with our own DNA involves a similar, if not identical, set of access means driven by common or natural language sets – that is, we can talk our DNA into contracting its coils or relaxing and expanding them at will, with significant differences in the quality of life and health of people who do either one or the other. This is a factor currently being massively manipulated by hands both invisible and powerful enough (my own conclusion) to set up social and psychological environments highly propitious to instrumental conditioning and response set development on our part that are convenient and necessary to their control and manipulation. This is especially true of the economy and expectations of the citizenry.

We are not only being suppressed in overt expression of opinions, views, personal lifestyles that do not promote and contribute to the seemingly established goal of “social instability and psychological chaos,” as one informant of mine put it, but also in our internal rate and range of genetic expression of our own DNA!

Who we are

As a species, or more properly, biokind (biological kind), we humans of Earth have a most promising future indeed, if left to our own devices. But we are not, and won’t be, so long as powerful offworld interests already merged with certain national interests in the form of TTPs (technology transfer programs) continue unabated. The answers to what and who we are and why we won’t be allowed to manifest our full regalia of capabilities are closely intertwined and must be considered together.

We are complex oscillating biological entities of broad horizontal connectivity (connectivity in our own 4-space/time) and unusually deep vertical connectivity (or the ability to extend in octavials damn near to the doors of heaven itself). One of the things we keep being reminded of by hyperversals entities (or people who actually live in space/times that are completely orthogonal, or off-phase to us here) is that, while we have yet to traverse a still longer evolutionary pathway, we are at this stage quite capable of the feats they are (i.e., travel in space and time without having to use a vehicle in space or leave our bodies behind in time), but don’t know how because we have told ourselves it is impossible, or worse yet, a sin. Yet, we are told that these capabilities are literally inscribed in the still relatively pristine DNA of the kids being born today, and in the DNAs of adults who have guarded closely the preservation of the internal child.

Knowing then who and what we are, it is obvious that this is not in the best interest of biokinds who either have suppressed their own range and rate of genetic expressions such that they are not able to do what we can, or have become dependent (some would say, addicted) to external means of interconnectivity (which, I’m finding out, is also a means of control, correction and suppression). We have in us partial DNA sequences from another life form that came to Earth 450,000 years ago; this we know with considerable certainty now.

What is not known about them is that their dependence (no, addiction) to ORME gold has contributed to a considerable densification of genetic sequences (i.e., the need to artificially induce the regrowth and slowed shortening of telomeres between genes [a kind of biological clock to our cells] to induce a kind of artificially supported longevity, which we are now trying to copy for ourselves). We do not yet realize that this is possible by means open to what our children today are capable of doing, which is to set up induction protocols that lead to the same results without dependence on any external technology or substance.


Will read and comment on your reply later. Again, no name (even though there is reference to a book being written).

Posted in Exopolitical Interventions | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Integration Into ET Reality 2